Civil Rights Groups Defending Predatory Lenders: Priceless. So what does Martin Luther King Jr. need to do with payday lenders?

Civil Rights Groups Defending Predatory Lenders: Priceless. So what does Martin Luther King Jr. need to do with payday lenders?

Nada, but which hasn’t stopped African American leaders from invoking their title as they shill for the credit industry.

Stephanie Mencimer

  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • E-mail
  • Printing
  • Commentary

The president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), took to the op-ed page of the Washington Post to decry the devastating effect the meltdown was having on minority homeowners at the end of June, as the subprime mortgage crisis was driving the economy into a tailspin, Charles Steele Jr. But instead than help measures that are currently pending better control the credit areas, the first choice of 1 associated with nation’s earliest civil legal rights teams rather attacked them. Steele had been particularly upset in regards to a Federal Reserve proposition that will break straight down on subprime bank cards—high-interest cards advertised to people who have bad credit.

As the civil legal rights team happens to be lauding its business partner, the us government has brought a somewhat various view of CompuCredit’s efforts to financial empowerment. Final thirty days, the Federal Trade Commission sued the business for unjust and trade that is deceptive, along with breaking the Fair commercial collection agency ways Act. The FTC alleged that CompuCredit bilked consumers away from at the very least $217 million via a scheme for which customers paid plenty in charges they hardly ever had any credit available regarding the ongoing company’s Visa cards. The CompuCredit cards are better referred to as “fee harvesting” cards—that is, bank cards offered to people in serious economic straits which have high interest levels, low credit balances, and a whole load of costs for folks who generally can’t manage them. The training is extremely profitable. The nationwide customer Law Center states that in 2006, CompuCredit made $400 million in costs on such cards, simultaneously saddling customers with additional than $1 billion with debt.

The FTC additionally alleged that CompuCredit had been doing work in tandem using its debt-collection supply, Jefferson Capital, in a scheme that is complex utilized the charge cards as a means of duping customers into paying down old debts reviews that were released by other loan providers. Not even close to raising customers upward, CompuCredit ended up being making its customers mired with debt, from where they’d have tough time escaping.

The fraudulence allegations resistant to the company don’t appear to have soured the storied rights that are civil’s passion for this.

following the FTC filed its suit in June, Steele defended the business, stating that CompuCredit “has been a real buddy to the SCLC also to the communities and folks it acts, plus in our viewpoint is just one of the few monetary solutions businesses this is certainly working faithfully to improve use of credit in underserved communities.” Steele failed to get back a demand comment. Of CompuCredit’s relationship utilizing the SCLC, Tom Donahue, the business’s director of business communications, claims, “As a business that delivers credit items and economic solutions to economically underserved customers, CompuCredit comes with an abiding desire for using the services of people and third-party businesses that share our dedication to monetary education and also to assisting credit-challenged customers bridge their method to a prime credit history plus the monetary main-stream.”

William Jelani Cobb, a brief history teacher at Atlanta’s Spelman university that has followed the fortunes for the civil legal rights infrastructure, claims which he ended up being unacquainted with the SCLC’s relationship with CompuCredit, it is perhaps perhaps perhaps not amazed because of it. “It’s an indictment of what lengths SCLC moved from the historic origins. These people owe their presence to a claim that is moral assisting other black colored people. It is an outright betrayal of this.”

Leave a Reply

Close Menu